Next Up in Fiber Nation | Home Economics vs. Hitler: Sewing in WWII

Rosie the Riveter
Let the Interweave Knits Winter 2024 issue transport you to a winter wonderland of cozy knits! This remarkable edition features 14 extraordinary projects to immerse yourself in the uniqueness of specially crafted yarns.

Starting in the late 1800s, a group of visionary women began thinking about housework from the perspective of modern science. This new field came to be called home economics. The US government created the Bureau of Home Economics to harness its scientific approach for a variety of food and public health programs during WWI and the Great Depression. However, during WWII, the Bureau of Home Economics turned its focus to home sewing, empowering women in unexpected ways.



You can listen and subscribe to Fiber Nation on your platform of choice. If you love the podcast, please rate us and leave us a review on Apple Podcasts to help other fiber nerds find the show!


On today’s episode, we explore the radical origins behind home economics. You’ll hear how it became important enough to have its own federal agency, and learn how one particular sewing magazine became a game-changer during WWII.

A woman wearing a work jumpsuit in a black and white photo
This work suit was more than just a way to stay clean. It was an argument for the dignity and value of women’s labor. BHE Work Suit. Via the Smithsonian Institution’s Archives SIA-SIA2015-003212.jpeg
From the 1943 Fall/Winter issue of the Advance Fashions and Fabrics Book, published by the JCPenney Company

Want to learn more about author Danielle Dreilinger? Check out her book, The Secret History of Home Economics for a thorough exploration of the sometimes-fraught history of home ec.

Cover of The Secret History of Home Economics and the author, Danielle Dreilinger

Resources for this Episode

Patterns Described in Episode

Women & JCPenney

Bonus: The Terrible Recipes of the Great Depression

Be sure to check out the latest episode of Fiber Nation, Home Economics vs. Hitler: Sewing in WWII! You can listen on the player above, or wherever you prefer to get your podcasts. Don’t forget to subscribe via your favorite podcast app so you never miss an episode!

Thanks for listening,
Allison


More Crafting Traditions to Learn

Join the Conversation!

  1. It is amazing and shocking to me that you could write a book or do a podcast about how proud women were of their work and their sewing, and then be too ashamed of their work to use the word by which they described themselves: seamstress. My mother was apprenticed to a seamstress and worked as a professional seamstress before, during, and after the war at an exclusive dress shop. She helped support our family and gave me many experiences, like piano and ballet lessons, and even my college education, that we could not have afford had she not been a SEAMSTRESS. Instead, your advertiser chooses to use ‘sewer’, a place for wastewater, and you use ‘sewist’, which has no meaning at all. What are you ashamed of in particular? The work itself or the fact that women did it? I am very proud of the women and the work you described in your article; I am very ashamed of you.

  2. I thought the episode was very interesting! As a new sewist, I definitely wish that someone had taught me how to sew in school when I was young but it seems that, despite the fact that most women will run a household when they’re older we are not taught how to do so unless our mothers teach us. I think the negative perception that is portrayed about women working in the home in this podcast episode is a little bit frustrating for me. The women at that time would have been proud to give up their positions so that their husband’s fathers and brothers could go back to work just as they were proud to take up the positions while they were away. They also would have been relieved to be able to have opportunities to dress in those really dresses after all of the time they spent working so hard. I would say that we have probably swung in the opposite direction in our culture now where instead of oppressing women and forcing them to fit a mold full-time bearing children at home as a homemaker, culture (at least in the north and the coasts) seems to slightly look down it’s nose on women who choose to stay home full time as if to choose this path is inferior to choosing work outside of the home. Fashions and fabric magazine was simply reflecting the reality of women’s lives at the time which was women as homemakers mainly. The vast majority of women very likely did not see this as a disappointing reality and most women would have embraced the role.

  3. Home Economics vs Hitler. Very interesting podcast! Very! My mother-in-law was a home ec teacher then a government teacher as her career. She was not a frilly person, but a doer and very practical. Her children became engineers and accountants. She also took pride in looking nice and taking care of her home. To each his own, so I will voice my opinion… I worked too, while raising children, as did my mother and grandmother and yet we liked to look pretty and made some of those pretty dresses. I miss home ec in the schools today.

Save patterns, share updates, and connect with your community.

Monthly Membership

$14.99


Join Now

 

Best Value

Annual Membership

$99.99


Join Now

 

  • FREE access to over 8,000 projects and patterns
  • Connect and create with a community of crafters just like you
  • Access digital issues of Beadwork, Lapidary Journal Jewelry Artist, Interweave Crochet, and Interweave Knits

View All Benefits

*Membership cannot be purchased with Gift Cards.